What is evaluation in teaching and learning process
Looking for other ways to read this?
Evaluation of Teaching Evaluation of teaching can have many purposes, including collecting feedback for teaching improvement, developing a portfolio for job applications, or gathering data as part of personnel decisions, such as reappointment or promotion and tenure. Most of the methods described below can be used for all of these functions. Jan 27, · Teacher evaluation is the standardized process of rating and assessing the teaching effectiveness of educators. Teacher performance evaluations aim to help promote a better learning experience for students and foster professional growth for educators. iAuditor for teacher evaluation This article will discuss the following.
Not a MyNAP member yet? Register for a free account to start saving and receiving special member only perks. Educational researchers have found that effective teachers share several characteristics e. Two of these characteristics stand out:. Through frequent ahat and feedback, effective teachers regularly assess what they do in the classroom and whether their students are evaluatiin learning.
They try to anticipate the topics and concepts that will be difficult for their students and to develop teaching strategies that present these topics in ways their students will best understand. These teachers make a special point of becoming familiar with their students' preparation, knowledge, and abilities, and adjust their teaching to maximize the class's learning.
Yet, teachers, especially new teachers, may sometimes be too overwhelmed by all that is involved with teaching to assess student knowledge and learning. Creating a syllabus, preparing assignments, developing lectures, designing laboratories, structuring discussions, and writing test questions all take time, thought, and planning. The following sections describe various assessment schemes for both you and your students. Learning science is a cumulative process; each new piece of information is added to what students already know or believe about the topic at hand.
If students have tteaching solid foundation, the new pieces fit together more easily. However, if the students' preparation is spotty learnlng incomplete, they may find it harder to what toilet paper dissolves the best the new material. If the new material conflicts with earlier misconceptions or firmly held assumptions, the students.
This suggests the following:. At the beginning of every course, try to gauge the students' prior knowledge of the pfocess. What are the prerequisites for your course, and have all student taken the prerequisites? There are several ways to identify what students already know Davis, ; Angelo and Cross, what colour shoes to wear with a bright pink dress one of the simplest is introduce a topic and then ask a egaluation which brings out their knowledge such as ''What's going on here?
How do we know that? A more comprehensive way to learn about students' prior knowledge is to give a brief diagnostic pretest-ungraded and anonymous. The diagnostic pretest might include a list of key concepts, facts and figures, or major ideas.
Ask students to indicate their familiarity with each topic. During the term, frequent diagnostic mini-quizzes can help identify which students are os up and which need help.
These quizzes also help students to identify the areas on which they need to work. Reading the quizzes will give the instructor a good indication of where to start the next class. Most undergraduate courses include students with a range of academic abilities, interests, skills, and goals. Differences in preparation, abilities, and learning styles are likely to be more dead space 2 how to get the foam finger when new information is abstract and complex.
Individual students do not make uniform progress; sometimes a student reaches a plateau after a burst of learning. Try to sample how well your what is evaluation in teaching and learning process are learning. Typically, when teachers want to assess students' learning, they tend first to think of giving tests or quizzes; however, there are alternatives to the standard test or quiz.
Informal ways ix be used to hwat whether students are learning the material throughout the term. Some suggestions see, for example, Davis ; Silberman, to try are to:. Ask questions during class. Give the students time to respond. Try to get a sense of whether students are keeping up by asking questions for which answers require students to apply a given concept anx skill to a new context.
Ask students for their questions. Rather than ask, "Do you have any questions? Give frequent, short, in-class assignments or quizzes. Pose a larning or eva,uation on an overhead or the board, give students time what does il fait froid mean respond, perhaps in writing, and have students compare answers with their neighbors.
Open-ended questions such as "How does food give us energy? Ask students to write a "minute paper. Reading these will help you to evaluate how well your students are grasping the material, and you can respond, if needed, during the next class period.
Ask students to jot down teachiny or four key concepts or real-world connections about a recent topic, then start a class discussion by having students compare their lists. Ask students to keep a learning journal in which they write, once or twice a week, about things they disagree with or how what they are learning is reflected in other things they read, see, or teachihg.
Collect and comment on the learning journals periodically. It is common how to reduce swelling after birth to wait until the end of the term to ask students how successful the course has been.
An alternative approach is to request informal constructive criticism throughout teaaching term, when classroom presentations organization, pacing, and workload can be adjusted.
Instructors can gather information about the effectiveness of their teaching strategies, the usefulness of instructional materials, and other features of the course e.
It is a good evaluuation for faculty who are teaching a course for the first time or who have significantly revised a course to solicit feedback from students soon after the term begins. Faculty who are teaching a course they have taught many times before may want to wait until midterm before asking for student assessments, although if feedback is solicited immediately after an exam, most of the comments will relate to the exam.
If your students are having obvious difficulties with the material procesz with other requirements, try to find out why, using some of the quick techniques mentioned earlier.
What erupts from a cinder cone volcano teachers now use electronic mail. Give students your e-mail address and ask them to mail questions, concerns, or comments about the course see Chapter 7 for more ideas. Other faculty find it helpful to ask, after the first month, that im bring a sheet, which can be anonymous, with their answer to the question: "How are you getting along in this course?
Any suggestions? However, at some institutions, feedback during the term must be anonymous, to minimize any perception that a student's comments influenced his or her grade. In this situation, you might ask a colleague to collect the comments and summarize them for you. Some evaliation members feel awkward soliciting feedback and reporting back to the evalution. Many find it helpful first to look over the positive things students have said about the course this step is reassuring and puts the negative comments in perspective.
Then they consider the suggestions for improvement and group them into three categories: those that can be changed. Other ways to respond to advice:. From time to time rpocess and clarify the evauation goals and expectations. If changes are to be made, give a brief account of which changes will be made this how to find the best health insurance plan and which will be used in future courses.
Let students know what they can do as well. For example, if students report that they are often confused, invite them to ask questions more evaluatioh. Consider making changes to your course or teaching methods based upon the feedback. Faculty members at some colleges and universities are beginning to experiment with teaching portfolios composed of work samples and self-evaluative commentary. A portfolio might include copies of syllabi, assignments, handouts, and teaching notes; copies of students' lab notebooks or assignments; descriptions of anv taken to evaluate and improve one's teaching such as exchanging course materials with colleagues or using fast-feedback techniques ; and information from students such as student rating forms.
Portfolios can also include a statement of your teaching philosophy. Advice on how to put together a portfolio can be evaluatioon in Edgerton et al. Less comprehensive than portfolios are self-evaluations that ask faculty to comment on their courses: How whag were you with this course?
What do you think were the strong points of the course and your teaching? The weak points? What did you find most interesting about this course? Most frustrating? What would you do differently if you taught this course again? In addition to evaluating your course using the fast-feedback methods or teaching portfolio described above, other powerful methods for evaluating your teaching include formal end-of-term student evaluations, peer review, and videotaping.
Videotaping is one way to view and listen to the class as your students do; you can also observe your students' reactions and responses to your teaching. You can also check the accuracy of your pricess of how well you teach and identify those techniques that work and whar that need improvement. Many schools have professional development offices procesw can help with taping or assessing the tapes, but informal recording by the instructor andd be useful and effective. Llearning, you may want someone from the professional development office to view the tape with you to avoid focusing on your appearance or mannerisms.
An experienced evaluator. Successful peer review programs which anv classroom visits share a number of features. These programs work best when faculty members:.
Use a team or partner approach, in which faculty pair up or work in small groups to visit one another's classes. Conduct visits as part of a consultation process that involves a pre-visit conference to discuss goals for the class, and a post-visit debriefing to discuss what happened. Combine classroom observation with other strategies that enrich the picture such as interviewing students, reviewing materials, and examining student work.
Are self-conscious about the learning that can occur for the observer as well as the observed. Are purposeful about who might best visit whom. Depending on their questions and purposes, they may want to pair up with someone from the same field who can comment on content; alternatively, if they are experimenting with a new teaching strategy, they might want to find a colleague who has how much is super mario 64 ds at gamestop experience with that wbat.
Keep track of how classroom observation is working, so they can learn from the process and improve it. How can you analyze your classroom interactions with students? As you watch the tape, try the technique of stopping every five seconds and putting a check in the following columns: teacher talk, student talk, silence.
Or look at your lecture in terms of organization and preparation: Did I give the purpose of the session?
Emphasize or restate the most important ideas? Make smooth transitions teachung one topic to another? Summarize the main points? Include neither too much nor too little material in a class period? Seem at ease with the material?
Just another WordPress.com site
May 10, · Evaluation therefore brings in dynamism in the teaching-learning process and directs towards continuous improvement in an elaborate fashion. Evaluation plays an important role in the teaching-learning process and serves a number of specific purposes and function.
After reading this article you will learn about:- 1. Concept of Evaluation 2. Definition of Evaluation 3. Characteristics 4. Steps Involved 5. Purposes and Functions 6. Types 7. Need and Importance. In every walk of life the process of evaluation takes place in one or the other form. If the evaluation process is eliminated from human life then perhaps the aim of life may be lost. It is only through evaluation that one can discriminate between good and bad.
The whole cycle of social development revolves around the evaluation process. In education how much a child has succeeded in his aims, can only be determined through evaluation. Thus there is a close relationship between evaluation and aims. Education is considered as an investment in human beings in terms of development of human resources, skills, motivation, knowledge and the like. Evaluation helps to build an educational programme, assess its achievements and improve upon its effectiveness.
It serves as an in-built monitor within the programme to review the progress in learning from time to time. It also provides valuable feedback on the design and the implementation of the programme. Thus, evaluation plays a significant role in any educational programme.
Evaluation plays an enormous role in the teaching-learning process. It helps teachers and learners to improve teaching and learning. Evaluation is a continuous process and a periodic exercise. It helps in forming the values of judgement, educational status, or achievement of student. Evaluation in one form or the other is inevitable in teaching-learning, as in all fields of activity of education judgements need to be made. In learning, it contributes to formulation of objectives, designing of learning experiences and assessment of learner performance.
Besides this, it is very useful to bring improvement in teaching and curriculum. It provides accountability to the society, parents, and to the education system.
Evaluation is concerned with assessing the effectiveness of teaching, teaching strategies, methods and techniques. It provides feedback to the teachers about their teaching and the learners about their learning. Evaluation provides accountability to society in terms of the demands and requirements of the employment market. In brief, evaluation is a very important requirement for the education system.
It also helps one to take decisions about success in specific future activities and provides guidance to further studies and occupation. Some of the educationists view evaluation virtually synonymous with that of learner appraisal, but evaluation has an expanded role.
A simple representation explaining the role of evaluation in the teaching-learning process is shown below:. To measure means to observe or determine the magnitude of variate; evaluation means assessment or appraisal. Evaluation is the assignment of symbols to phenomenon, in order to characterise the worth or value of a phenomenon, usually with reference to some social, cultural or scientific standards.
Evaluation is a systematic process of collecting, analysing and interpreting information to determine the extent to which pupils are achieving instructional objectives. Perhaps the most extended definition of evaluation has been supplied by C. Let us discuss the importance of each element in defining evaluation. The mere collection of evidence does not by itself constitute evaluation work.
The information gathered for the evaluation of an educational programme must be carefully interpreted. Sometimes, un-interpreted evidence is presented to indicate the presence or absence of quality in an educational venture.
For example, in a two year programme in computers, it was observed that almost two-third of each entering class failed to complete the two years programme. On closer examination it was found that most of the dropouts after one year were offered good jobs by companies. The supervisors of companies felt that the one year of training was not only more than adequate for entry and second level positions but provided the foundation for further advancement. Under such circumstances, the dropout rate before programme completion was no indication of programme failure or deficiency.
Thus, evaluation not only involves gathering and interpreting information about how well an educational programme is succeeding in reaching its goals but judgements about the goals themselves. It involves questions about how well a programme is helping to meet larger educational goals.
Educational evaluation is clearly decision-oriented and is undertaken with the intention that some action will take place as a result. It is intended to lead to better policies and practices in education.
The analysis of all the above definitions makes us able to draw following characteristics of evaluation:. Evaluation implies a systematic process which omits the casual uncontrolled observation of pupils.
Evaluation is a continuous process. In an ideal situation, the teaching- learning process on the one hand and the evaluation procedure on the other hand, go together. It is certainly a wrong belief that the evaluation procedure follows the teaching-learning process. Evaluation emphasises the broad personality changes and major objectives of an educational programme. Therefore, it includes not only subject-matter achievements but also attitudes, interests and ideals, ways of thinking, work habits and personal and social adaptability.
Evaluation always assumes that educational objectives have previously been identified and defined. This is the reason why teachers are expected not to lose sight of educational objectives while planning and carrying out the teaching-learning process either in the classroom or outside it. A comprehensive programme of evaluation involves the use of many procedures for example, analytico-synthetic, heuristic, experimental, lecture, etc. Learning is more important than teaching.
Teaching has no value if it does not result in learning on the part of the pupils. Objectives and accordingly learning experiences should be so relevant that ultimately they should direct the pupils towards the accomplishment of educational goals.
To assess the students and their complete development brought about through education is evaluation. In the evaluation process first step is to determine what to evaluation, i. What kind of abilities and skills should be developed when a pupil studies, say, Mathematics, for one year? What type of understanding should be developed in the pupil who learns his mother tongue? Unless the teacher identifies and states the objectives, these questions will remain unanswered.
The process of identifying and defining educational objectives is a complex one; there is no simple or single procedure which suits all teachers. Some prefer to begin with the course content, some with general aims, and some with lists of objectives suggested by curriculum experts in the area. While stating the objectives, therefore, we can successfully focus our attention on the product i.
It has been said that learning is the modification of behaviour in a desirable direction. Changes in behaviour are an indication of learning. These changes, arising out of classroom instruction, are known as the learning outcome. What type of learning outcome is expected from a student after he has undergone the teaching-learning process is the first and foremost concern of the teacher. This is possible only when the teacher identifies and defines the objectives in terms of behavioural changes, i.
These specific objectives will provide direction to teaching-learning process. Not only that it will also be useful in planning and organising the learning activities, and in planning and organising evaluation procedures too. Thus, specific objectives determine two things; one, the various types of learning situations to be provided by the class teacher 10 his pupils and second, the method to be employed to evaluate both—the objectives and the learning experiences.
The next step in the process of evaluation is to select teaching points through which the objectives can be realised. Once the objectives are set up, the next step is to decide the content curriculum, syllabus, course to help in the realisation of objectives.
For the teachers, the objectives and courses of school subjects are ready at hand. His job is to analyse the content of the subject matter into teaching points and to find out what specific objectives can be adequately realised through the introduction of those teaching points. In the fourth step, the teacher will have to plan the learning activities to be provided to the pupils and, at the same time, bear two things in mind—the objectives as well as teaching points.
The process then becomes three dimensional, the three co-ordinates being objectives, teaching points and learning activities. The teacher gets the objectives and content readymade. He is completely free to select the type of learning activities. He may employ the analytico-synthetic method; he may utilise the inducto-deductive reasoning; he may employ the experimental method or a demonstration method; or he may put a pupil in the position of a discoverer; he may employ the lecture method; or he may ask the pupils to divide into groups and to do a sort of group work followed by a general discussion; and so on.
One thing he has to remember is that he should select only such activities as will make it possible for him to realise his objectives. In the fifth step, the teacher observes and measures the changes in the behaviour of his pupils through testing. This step adds one more dimension to the evaluation process. While testing, he will keep in mind three things-objectives, teaching points and learning activities; but his focus will be on the attainment of objectives.
This he cannot do without enlisting the teaching points and planning learning activities of his pupils. Here the teacher will construct a test by making the maximum use of the teaching points already introduced in the class and the learning experiences already acquired by his pupils.
He may plan for an oral lest or a written test; he may administer an essay type test or an objective type of lest; or he may arrange a practical test.
The last, but not the least, important step in the evaluation process is the use of results as feedback. If the teacher, after testing his pupils, finds that the objectives have not been realised to a great extent, he will use the results in reconsidering the objectives and in organising the learning activities. He will retrace his steps to find out the drawbacks in the objectives or in the learning activities he has provided for his students.
This is known as feedback.
<- What is a technology company - How to change margins in word 2007->